Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh on Saturday wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in search of continuance of the present system of fee to farmers for crop procurement until a consensus is advanced on the difficulty of direct profit switch.
Presently, the fee to farmers is being made by means of “arhtiyas” (fee brokers) in Punjab.
Union Food Minister Piyush Goyal had written to the state authorities on March 27, asking it to implement direct fee to farmers.
The CM stated any reform, together with direct fee to farmers, must be first mentioned with all stakeholders.
“Any sudden changes that disturbs the existing arrangements may jeopardise the procurement operations, thereby not only affecting the food security of the nation but also threatening the livelihood of millions of farmers, farm-workers and even traders,” he stated.
The CM asserted that “arhtiyas” should not middlemen between farmers and the procurement companies however are service suppliers, in response to a authorities assertion.
He urged the PM to make sure that the livelihood of farmers and all others concerned within the clean procurement of foodgrains isn’t jeopardised.
The CM additionally sought a gathering with the PM to apprise him about considerations of assorted stakeholders about altering the present fee system “before the situation gets out of hand”.
On behalf of the Punjab authorities, he assured Modi of his full assist in the direction of evolving a consensus amongst the stakeholders for long-term sturdy reforms.
Expressing concern over current efforts to “rock” the legally sanctioned and well-established institutional and social preparations by means of some tips and directives of the Centre, the CM stated he had observed a sample in among the current “one-sided decisions and steps”.
He added that as a soldier and a farmer himself, he want to spotlight the dangers and threats which can be prone to be posed for the meals safety of the nation on account of a few of these selections for being “completely detached from ground realities of farming in this part of the country”.
Recalling the position of farmers of Punjab, Haryana and Western UP in ushering within the inexperienced revolution and making certain meals safety, he stated safety methods and defences are constructed over many years however will be compromised and demolished in moments.
“While I fully endorse the views that as a society and as nation we have to continuously evolve and reform, and as the political leadership of the world’s largest democracy, we have to continuously think of improving, but I strongly believe that reforms are most successful and sustainable if carried out through a consultative process with all stakeholders, ensuring ownership of all,” stated the CM.
He sought the PM’s intervention within the matter with a request to advise the Department of Food and Public Distribution and the Ministry of Finance to provoke discussions with stakeholders, together with farmers, farm staff and “arhtiyas“, to evolve a mutually acceptable system by means of consensus.
He stated the mutually dependent relationship between farmers and “arhtiyas” has developed over generations and it helped the agrarian system to develop to the current ranges.
In truth, the connection is a pivot on which the seamless procurement rotates, he famous, including that “arhtiyas” present companies like drying and cleansing the produce earlier than it’s provided for public sale after which bagging the produce and protecting it safely until it’s lifted by the procuring company.
The “arhtiya” thus offers companies and performs the duties that in any other case can be carried out both by the farmers or the procuring company, he stated, including that “these involve huge costs, which cannot be transferred to the farmers.”
Citing present guidelines and courtroom selections, the CM stated each offered for a “freedom” and “choice” to the farmer for fee in opposition to his produce.
Pointing out that yearly about Rs 54,000 crore of fee is made to about 12.50 lakh farmers in two cropping seasons, he stated there have been no main complaints or reviews of non-receipt of fee by farmers.